5.1 Management Commitment
(1994 clause, 4.1.1)
Top management shall provide
evidence of its commitment to
the development and
implementation of the quality
management system and
continually improving its
effectiveness by
a) communicating to the
organization the importance of
meeting customer as well as
statutory and regulatory
requirements,
b) establishing the quality
policy,
c) ensuring that quality
objectives are established,
d) conducting management
reviews, and
e) ensuring the availability of
resources.
(From BS EN ISO 9001:2000)
This clause makes the "top 5
list" of new changes in ISO
9001:2000.
To begin, the phrase "top
management" is used in ISO
9001:2000 instead of the old
phrase, "executive management."
The change occurred for two
reasons: First, "executive
management" didn't translate
well into other languages, such
as French and Russian. Second,
and perhaps more important,
there is a much stronger
emphasis concerning the
involvement of an organization's
top leaders as active
participants to ensure the PDCA
Cycle works properly.
Of course, there's still room
for interpretation concerning
how "top management" is defined
in your organization-and that's
up to you (and top management)
to decide.
In ISO 9000:2000, top
management is defined simply as
a "person or group of people who
directs and controls an
organization at the highest
level." That could mean the
person or group might be located
across the hall from you or they
might be at headquarters on the
other side of the world. However
you define it, this must be
established early in your
journey for your organization to
have success with implementation
and registration.
Another major change with ISO
9001:2000 appears in Clause
5.1.a, which states that top
management must communicate to
the organization "the importance
of meeting customer as well as
statutory and regulatory
requirements." Although the
standard says little to explain
what that means, this is very
important to the business and
the management system from every
perspective.
Think of it this way: Your
company makes automotive parts
for all of the major
manufacturers, and you've just
discovered that your products
(which were shipped to the
client last Thursday) failed to
meet the industry's baseline
safety standards. Additionally,
you just found out that while
manufacturing these products,
your company violated 11
national and state regulations,
which range from violations
concerning the environment to
transportation and distribution
statutes in four states.
This situation is obviously
not good for anyone. Your
company has violated laws and
failed industry standards, which
will cost the organization
significantly in areas such as
fines and penalties, lost
product, bad value for the long
term and bad press-not to
mention that nasty shareholder
meeting the CEO is going to have
to deal with next quarter.
All of this might have been
avoided, however, if top
management had communicated
those regulations and standards
effectively throughout the
organization. At the end of each
day, a company needs to make
sure it's following all
applicable laws so that
potential infractions don't
prevent it from doing business.
The new standard also
stresses management's commitment
and involvement with
establishing the organization's
quality policy and quality
objectives. This commitment was
similar in the 1994 version, but
there is a new emphasis and
intended requirement with ISO
9001:2000 to align the quality
policy and quality objectives
with the organization's overall
business plan. Doing so can
ensure that everyone in the
business is reading from the
same book
|
|
|
|
Home
| Products
|
Downloads
|
Online Store |
Support
| Training |
Partner | News |
Licensing
| About Us
|
Contact Us
Legal Terms | Privacy Policy | Brand
GuideLines |
Common Criteria
Copyright © 2000 - 2006 Open Mind Solutions Inc. All Rights Reserved
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS,
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS, DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS, GENERAL, QUALITY MANUAL, CONTROL OF
DOCUMENTS, CONTROL OF RECORDS, MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIBILITY, MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT, CUSTOMER FOCUS, QUALITY POLICY, PLANNING, QUALITY OBJECTIVES, QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PLANNING, RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION, RESPONSIBILITY AND AUTHORITY, MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVE,
INTERNAL COMMUNICATION, MANAGEMENT REVIEW, GENERAL MANAGEMENT REVIEW, REVIEW INPUT, REVIEW OUTPUT, RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, PROVISION OF RESOURCES, HUMAN RESOURCES, GENERAL, COMPETENCE, AWARENESS AND TRAINING, INFRASTRUCTURE, WORK ENVIRONMENT, PRODUCT REALIZATION, PLANNING OF PRODUCT REALIZATION, CUSTOMER-RELATED
PROCESSES, DETERMINATION OF REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE
PRODUCT, REVIEW OF REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCT, CUSTOMER COMMUNICATION, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PLANNING, DESIGN AND
DEVELOPMENT INPUTS, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OUTPUTS, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
VERIFICATION, DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT VALIDATION, CONTROL OF DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT CHANGES, PURCHASING, PURCHASING PROCESS, PURCHASING INFORMATION, VERIFICATION OF PURCHASED PRODUCT, PRODUCT AND SERVICE
PROVISION, CONTROL OF PRODUCTION AND SERVICE PROVISION, VALIDATION PROCESSES FOR PRODUCTION AND SERVICE PROVISION, IDENTIFICATION AND TRACEABILITY, CUSTOMER PROPERTY,
PRESERVATION OF PRODUCT, CONTROL OF MONITORING AND
MEASURING DEVICES, MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND
IMPROVEMENT, GENERAL MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND
IMPROVEMENT, MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT, CUSTOMER
SATISFACTION, INTERNAL AUDITS, MONITORING AND
MEASUREMENT OF PROCESSES, MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT OF
PRODUCT, CONTROL OF NONCONFORMING PRODUCT, ANALYSIS OF DATA, IMPROVEMENT, CONTINUAL
IMPROVEMENT, CORRECTIVE ACTION, PREVENTIVE ACTION,
ISO 9001 GUIDE |